Electric Bowl
This might exist already, but I make it a point not to do any research.
Filed under Inventions | Comment (0)The resurrection!
So, I broke the website a while back. And when I went to fix it I found I was missing all posts newer than June 2007.
I found all of the posts in an RSS cache, but had to paste them in one at a time. While I was at it I decided to self-critique all of those old, forgotten posts. Kind of like a director’s commentary. It was fun.
The first commentary starts on October 3rd, 2007. Then I work my way up to THE PRESENT DAY (September 28th 2008, actually).
Check em’ out!
Filed under Inventions | Comment (0)Soft Rocket
Oh, hello. Found this sad little rocket in an old sketch book. Was meant to be a t-shirt design. T-shirt design is kind of boring, though. Maybe the cleverist t-shirt has nothing on it?
updated 01/09: looking back: love the idea. The commentary is kind of lame, though. A t-shirt with nothing on it would be stupid! Only YOU would get the joke…the very same problem the average conceptual art piece has.
In all truthfulness, my problem with tshirt designs with a “message” is the same problem I have with bumper stickers (and all types of social affiliations, religious or political). The hazard is giving the impression that your entire existence can be expressed through one particular sentiment, idea, or membership. The mere act of CHOOSING a symbol is an act of exclusivity of all other ideas, because you chose THIS symbol over THAT symbol. Any kind of choice results in an oversimplification of reality, and oversimplification of your experience of the world.
You have CHOSEN to misrepresent and oversimplify yourself, and why would you want to do that? You are thoughtful and fair, and carefully weigh and balance all sides of an argument, listen carefully, and clarify facts (as you know them) and misconceptions. You try to be honest, but not brash. You believe in truth and justice, but know the world is a complicated place, and not everyone can see eye to eye. So, why would you put a one-liner on the back of your car, or the front of your body? Are you a one-liner?
The message of this particular design? War is an ineffectual way of achieving peace. And there’s nothing wrong with that idea. And a rocket shaped like a flaccid penis is funny. The “problem” with the concept is that it excludes the legitimacy of a country needing to defend itself (with a rocket for example). The soft rocket negates that possibility, because the concept expressed isn’t “war is bad when it’s not justified according to my calculations, but it is totally justified when I feel it is so”. It is simply, “War is unjustified.” Sometimes it is, and sometimes it isn’t, but all you know by looking at my shirt is that I believe there is no such thing as a justified war.
Filed under Miscellaneous | Comment (0)12-Step Program alternative
I have an idea for a much simpler program. It has only one step.
Step #1: stop drinking.
udpated 01/09: looking back: maybe that’s why there’s so much recidivism with recovering alcoholics: none of the twelve steps is “stop drinking.”
The 6 Million Dollar Man’s cost if built today?
Using 1974 (when the show first aired) dollars and adjusting for inflation, about 26 million in 2008 dollars.
updated 01/09: looking back: there’s no idea here. Just a boring fact. However, I based the calculation on actual inflation data, so if you want to actually build the 6 million dollar man that is how much it will cost.
Filed under Inventions | Comment (0)New York vs. Los Angeles : who’s smarter?
Let’s consider fashion sense as a gauge of intelligence. To do that we’ll begin with some broad generalizations, but we may need to define some new stereotypes as well.
New York fashion ranges from classy 5th avenue to the cringingly painfully hip, and everything inbetween. The worst dressed in Manhattan are the tourists, who’re either decked out in their new sweat pants and 5-sizes-too big (but we still know you’re fat) t-shirts or LL Bean trail shoes, fanny pack, and zip-off pants.
Los Angeles fashion is just varing degrees of trashy, where most of the “well-dressed” look like they just stepped into or out of a tattoo parlor (which they in fact just did). There’s the late-30’s sloppy rockabillys, half-assed punk rockers (blue mohawk and studded bracelets and pumping gas into my mini-van), thrift store cannon-ballers with 80’s style hairsprayed bangs, and hipster wanna-be’s with ironic ring-neck t-shirts (ie. a classic Nintendo game pad) and white socks.
The differences in fashion-intelligence between New Yorkers and Los Angelesers(?) are real, but does it have anything to do with basic intelligence? Are New Yorkers smarter just because they dress smarter? You be the judge, but the answer is yes and yes.
updated 01/09: looking back: I really want to delete this one. So negative!
I had just moved to LA and it was really getting on my nerves, so this outburst was a tiny catharsis. Curiously, though, my general take on LA fashion hasn’t changed much in 5 months. There’s something about the way people assemble their outfits…so desperate to stand out, often resulting in a costume quality. In fact there is a store on Melrose that specializes in leather, and all of their outfits look like costumes from Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome.
The other problem with this post is that it isn’t an idea. It’s an arrogant observation.
Filed under Inventions | Comment (0)LAVA life
LAVA life is a type of life that originated from molten rock. If water is the key to life simple because of its fluidity, then maybe life could originate in lava if there were different type of molecules that stayed intact at high temperatures. These hot molecules could eventually coagulate into life-stuff. Like lava amoebas, lava fish, lava dogs, and lava people who eat lava sandwiches.
update 01/09: looking back: pretty good idea. Why couldn’t life develop from any neutral fluid? Isn’t that all water is? ISN’T IT?
Filed under Miscellaneous | Comment (0)Star Chair
updated 01/09: looking back: truth be told, it’s a star and a chair.
Filed under Inventions | Comment (0)Soda and Pants
updated 01/09: looking back: just some silly stuff.
Filed under Comics | Comment (0)Penguin Life

updated 01/09: looking back: cute. Somehow the penguin went to a disco.
Not sure how obvious this is, but all these little badly drawn comics came out of my small Moleskin. I used to sketch them on the way to work while riding the subway.
They’re not badly drawn because I was on the subway, they’re badly drawn because I made them.
Filed under Comics | Comment (0)Missed Opportunity
updated 01/09: looking back: changed the title from the original “treasure”. Funnier now? Cuz like what’s a bird going to do with treasure, anyway? But if a bird did know what to do with treasure, boy would he be sore if he found out he missed getting some.
Filed under Comics | Comment (0)Mosquitos
updated 01/09: looking back on this post: not super duper funny.
Filed under Comics | Comment (0)Talking Trash #1 – “Sharing”
updated 01/09: looking back: great concept, lazy execution. I’ve got dozen of these comics and a entire tragic story arc worked out.
Here’s the jist: Munch the trash can becomes extremely jealous when the dude brings a girl home, and plays their insecurities against each other until the girl is murdered by the trash can, who frames the guy for it. It was a desperate, and not very thought out move by the trash can (he’s only a talking trash can after all) to win back his pal’s affection, but the can ends up in a land fill and the guy goes to prison for 30 years and is eventually given a lethal injection. In the comic above we’re given a hint at the can’s manipulative personality.
My experience with Ponoko (Part 2 – Reality)
Some stories are best told through pictures:

The flat box:

I guess this is unboxing porn.
6mm Italian Poplar. It’s got some kind of adhesive on it for protection.

Poked-out:


But does it fit together?
Receiving package to putting final product to use? 10 minutes:

All of the pieces fit snugly and no glue or extra fastening is needed – just like I hoped. It isn’t obvious from the photos but there is one piece that doesn’t fit correctly. It’s the 3rd support beam that should be in rear. I miscalculated the depth of the groove. No biggie – it is the least important piece.

Overall I’m very impressed. It’s extremely sturdy, looks cool (vaguely like an elephant), and smells like a camp fire. I was hoping the keyboard (not pictured) would create a little more space while stowed, but that’s the way it goes.
updated 01/09: new thoughts on this post: it’s been a year and I’m still using this stand!
Filed under Inventions | Comment (0)







